US
UNITED STATES ANTIMONY CORP (UAMY)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 revenue rose 187% YoY to $10.53M, exceeding consensus by ~$0.59M (+6%)*; gross profit was $2.84M and net income was $0.18M (vs $0.20M in Q2’24). Management reiterated FY’25 revenue guidance of $40–$50M and said Thompson Falls’ six‑fold capacity expansion remains on schedule for year‑end .
- Antimony fundamentals drove pricing power: average realized price was $28.32/lb in Q2 (up 307% YoY), though volumes fell 11% YoY to 340,305 lbs; zeolite remained steady with 3,084 tons sold and improved unit economics .
- Operational cadence: record antimony inventories (201 tons as of 6/30, valued at ~$10.4M at Rotterdam pricing) set up 2H sell‑through; four Thompson Falls furnaces were refurbished and staffing issues addressed to raise throughput .
- Risks and near‑term timing: Alaska ore shipments slipped about a month (now likely September) on state permitting delays; Australian Mandalay feed contained out‑of‑spec arsenic and one shipment was returned—management is diversifying supply and deemphasizing Mandalay .
- Potential stock catalysts: possible DLA/DoD award (none awarded yet), Alaska ore arrivals, and completion of Thompson Falls expansion; management reiterated it “remains on track” for FY’25 revenue guidance .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Strong top‑line and gross profit: Q2 revenue $10.53M (+187% YoY); YTD gross margin expanded to 30% (vs 27% YTD last year), supported by robust antimony pricing and improved zeolite operations .
- Execution on capacity and readiness: four furnaces at Thompson Falls refurbished (~$300K) and new operators hired; plan to complete a six‑fold throughput expansion by year‑end remains on schedule .
- Capital markets traction: management engaged >120 funds; institutional ownership reached ~24% of float (121 accounts); average daily volume rose to 4.8M shares; dual‑listed on NYSE Texas .
- Quote: “We continue to remain on track for our previous revenue guidance of 40 million to 50 million for fiscal 2025.” — CEO Gary Evans .
What Went Wrong
- Product/Logistics headwinds in Q2: “suboptimum” Australian ore plus a Chinese embargo impacted materials destined for Madero; issues are now resolved per management .
- Supplier quality risk: Mandalay (Australia) concentrate above contracted arsenic specs; a 55‑ton shipment held in China since May was returned to Australia; UAMY is not counting on Mandalay going forward .
- Alaska permitting delay: state‑level process and local objections (Save Our Domes) pushed first shipments by ~one month to September (vs late summer) .
Financial Results
Headline financials (older → newer)
Year‑to‑date comparison
Segment/Revenue mix (Q2)
Operating KPIs (Q2)
Results vs S&P Global Consensus (Q2 2025)
Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- Strategic posture: “We continue to remain on track for our previous revenue guidance of 40 million to 50 million for fiscal 2025.” — Gary Evans, CEO .
- Government engagement: “No award has yet been officially made to USAC… should any award officially be made, we will make all required announcements.” — Melissa Pagen, SVP .
- Capacity and inventory: “We successfully retrofitted four existing furnaces… This will enable us to begin doubling production output… Construction is on schedule… by year‑end.” — CEO .
- Supply quality risk: “Two 55 ton loads from Mandalay were out‑of‑spec due to arsenic… the third load… returned to Australia… we are not counting on future material from Mandalay.” — CEO .
- Market context: “There is a worldwide shortage of antimony… supply will be an assembly of lots of different smaller quantities of ore from different places.” — CEO .
Q&A Highlights
- Domestic supply: No meaningful third‑party U.S. antimony sources expected near‑term; UAMY expects Alaska and Montana internal ore to be primary domestic sources .
- DLA solicitation: A $240M antimony procurement closed Aug 12; company awaiting process steps/outcome .
- Alaska update: Leasehold now ~23k–30k acres; private land acquired to proceed ahead of some state permits; first shipments likely September .
- Thompson Falls expansion: Still targeted for YE’25; expansion won’t disrupt current operations .
- Tungsten path: Fostung is low‑grade/open‑pittable; plan gravity upgrade onsite, then potential toll milling at Strathcona; start 4‑season environmental survey .
Estimates Context
- Revenue beat; EPS and EBITDA misses: Q2 revenue $10.53M vs $9.93M consensus (+6%); EPS actual “nil” vs $0.017; EBITDA $0.317M (actual) vs $0.9M consensus* .
- Street adjustments: With stronger realized antimony pricing, record inventories, and on‑schedule capacity increases, revenue estimates for 2H may drift higher; however, EBITDA expectations may need recalibration until mix, throughput, and ore quality normalize, and Alaska feed starts flowing .
Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Top‑line momentum is intact (Q2 revenue +187% YoY) and FY’25 revenue guidance of $40–$50M is reiterated; capacity and inventory position set up 2H volume .
- Antimony pricing power (Q2 avg $28.32/lb) outweighed lower volumes; diversified sourcing (Bolivia/Chad/Mexico/Peru) reduces reliance on problematic feed like Mandalay .
- Near‑term catalysts: possible DLA/DOD action (no award yet), first Alaska shipments (likely September), and YE Thompson Falls expansion completion .
- Watch profitability bridging: EBITDA missed consensus; throughput ramp, inventory monetization and Alaska ore cost advantages (management cites potential cost cut vs Rotterdam) will be key to margin recovery .
- Balance sheet remains serviceable: cash/HTM securities totaled ~$15.8M at 6/30, with minimal long‑term debt and a $5M undrawn LOC; capex weighted to expansion and Fostung .
- Execution risks: state permitting in Alaska, supplier quality variability, and internal control remediation (disclosure controls not effective) warrant monitoring .
- Trading lens: news on DLA/DOD, Alaska ore arrivals, and completion milestones are likely to drive sentiment more than quarterly EPS prints near‑term .